Sorry, guys! During system maintenance, some functions like comment are unavailable.
WARNING!! →→→SENSIYIVE TOPIC!!!
I have a genuine question,
Do you think criminals who sexually torture(also other types of gruesome sexual torture) other people don't deserve rape ? For instance, 44 days of hell, the men that did sexual gruesome torture to a girl just because she said no, do you think they still don't deserve to be raped? Or sexually and gruesomely tortured? I asked my friends and acquaintances about this, some say they do, some say they deserve more, but mostly they say no, they don't really explain why they do and why they don't deserve the same treatment they unleashed to their victims. But when I asked if someone killed a person, do they deserve to be killed? Most of them said yes. I understand why they think it's okay to kill a criminal who killed other people since the loved ones of those victims can't be brought back. Is it not the same when some is sexually tortured or raped? Is because they're alive that's why they don't "deserve" it? Why? Victims of those sexual activities could possibly not be not be the same because of the trauma , they might be alive but, mentally, they aren't. I'm talking about not just accidental sexual harassment, I'm talking about sexual tortures and rape that were done on purpose for the criminal's "enjoyment". I just can't understand the concept why they don't deserve the same torture they've shown to the victims, when they are just demons in disguised in humam masks. Do they believe those criminals that, they'll change because of just a little bit of jail time? Because I don't think so.
But just to be clear. I'm not emphasizing that accidental sexual harassment is excused.
To make someone rape the rapist you are just creating another rapist. I think sexual violence is worse than physical violence. So I suggest just cutting off the dick of the rapist or instead of animals make them the test subject of experiments . Because what are they gonna do? Say no? 6 reply
This is the most illogical suggestion, ever. First of all, who's gonna do all this payback rape you have planned? Other convicted rapists? Wouldn't that be a reward for them? Or do you think normal non-rapey people are gonna line up to get the job done? Before all the ethical and moral implications, your suggestion is just ridiculously impractical....... 1 reply
Raping a rapist makes another rapist, i think its hilarious that some people would even think that making themselves a rapist for the sake of 'justice' are any better than the rapist.
Psychologists generally agree that rape is a crime rooted in nonsexual motivations; tied to hostility, anger, and the need to exert power and control. Raping a rapis...... 1 reply
More interested in being proactive (harm reduction, by creating situations where rape can’t happen and nobody has the will to) then reactive, but since we don’t an appropriate community consciousness yet, what I would do is get them out the community and give them extensive mental therapy. Torturing them won’t do anything to stop them from cr...... reply
Well, I personally think neither does a murderer deserve to be killed nor does a rapist deserve to be raped. I'm with you on it being hypocritical if you say yes to the one but not to the other. And I agree that murder and sexual assault are similarly bad.
Generally I just genuinely believe - or rather want to believe - that humans can change and ...... 2 reply
My heart says yes but my mind says no. If they experience what they did to others themselves, that will be true punishment for them, like i have a sick shower thought (genuinely sickening, and i genuinely dont believe in what i am about to say) that 2 rapists should be made to rape each other, what are they gonna say, no? But that's not how the wor...... reply
