Technically no, this would fall more under “furry”, because the son is technically a person; he just looks like a wolf. I can understand the confusion, because there is a thin line between the two. But usually things are considered bestiality when a person is having sex with a creature (dog, horse, pig, etc.) that is clearly an animal (in that they behave how we expect an animal to behave and cannot talk) and is not able to physically voice their consent about having sex.
I am over simplifying it a bit. But just know that this is furry, because the son is identified as a person, but has animal features (think of it as, he’s a person wearing a wolf suit)
the adopted son is an antropomorphic animal which would make this fall under the definition of a furry
the comment on top of me is right
this can still be thought of bestiality if you think of koju as an animal
but the difference between this and actual bestiality is that in this story koju can actually consent
so if youre scared that reading this is bad because of sex between human and animal with human characteristic, you shouldnt worry that much
bestiality irl is looked down upon because animals cannot say that they are consenting but here they can
Ahh thank you so much !!
Is this not?.. beastiality??