Responses
Eh, people aren't usually that blatant and daddy kang was just being flirty and playing. His reasoning made sense seeing how cinnamon Ahn, from his perspective, is a man experienced in seduction(considering he slept with him for work and seemed very upfront about wanting sex)
Humans aren't mind readers and I completely get why Kang had the misunderstanding he did. I'm also glad for a story with actually believable misunderstanding.
How can he say he dropped any hints? Who would have taken any of them in any context that he assumed they qualified for!? Who would have been so presumptuous to read into those supposed "hints" as anything more than what our Ahn reasoned them to be -- just proper courtesies in a business relationship!
This imbecile. If director Kang wanted Ahn to approach him then he should have done it himself! What's with this ego play where he needs the other person to come to him first! You're the one who set the condition first, how can you expect others to not respect it and abide by it? You set the condition, you should have been the one to request to lift it! Not our beloved Ahn who simply did not want to disrespect this condition they both agreed to, and who did not want to jeopardize the working environment!
Kang needs to understand that while he is secure in his position and the status quo, Ahn has no such securities! Ahn is the leader of a small team that's here ON CONTRACT! How can Ahn possibly be expected to, in his right mind, be so bold and bypass basic premise of respect for their mutual decision!?
Ugh I'm so angry with Kang. I really don't get why Kang felt that it needed to be Ahn who had to make the first step. Just do it yourself, since you set the restriction there, and since you know you want to!