Responses
Right! All of their evidence is word of mouth and from (frankly) unreliable witnesses in the eyes of the public. I mean, we have the banished lady, the possible arsonist with the warrant out for her arrest, her sister, and an old lady who somehow evaded the massacre of witches, a practice happening for over a generation. AND she admitted to murdering a noble even IM not convinced by their storytelling and I saw all of it happen
It’s a trial where evidence is being presented to people who loathe and distrust witches… yet instead of pointing out how decades have passed while the marcheness hasn’t aged at all, they’re going to use witches as witnesses… even though the people they’re trying to convince don’t trust witches- not to mention how aristocracy values their own. Don’t just claim the noble is a witch, prove it! Why would they take the word of witches as truth just cause they show up in mass?