Sorry, guys! During system maintenance, some functions like comment are unavailable.

ew?

saraishere May 9, 2024 12:49 pm

this is weird bro, pedophilic even... they're literally sexually intimate

Responses
    tongtong May 9, 2024 12:57 pm

    Can you please explain to us how this au art pedophilic? Or its just your brain automatically filling it? buddy I'm kinda concern for you

    Very picky May 9, 2024 1:08 pm

    How in gods green earth is this art weird?? If anything YOU are the one making this “weird”.

    Melantha May 9, 2024 1:12 pm
    Can you please explain to us how this au art pedophilic? Or its just your brain automatically filling it? buddy I'm kinda concern for you tongtong

    The art itself doesn't have any sex depicted, sure. But the implication is still there. If I was drawn as a child next to my adult husband and nothing would be going on in the drawing it would still be iffy. If Jae was drawn as a child too it would not have those implications.
    Have you seen Sound of freedom? When those people take pics of the kids they are gonna traffic they unbutton the shirt. Noooooothing sexual there too, just one button, just a cute little photo YOU people would say.

    tongtong May 9, 2024 1:23 pm
    The art itself doesn't have any sex depicted, sure. But the implication is still there. If I was drawn as a child next to my adult husband and nothing would be going on in the drawing it would still be iffy. If... Melantha

    I checked the art for the third or fourth time and guess what DAN AND OTHERS ARE APPROPRIATELY CLOTHED, EVEN POTATO HAS A POTATO TO CENSORED HIM. their clothes doesn't have sexual implications that you are saying and this is very different topic and it's quite stretch to label this art as pedophilic. You guys are teh super weird one thinking this as weird and pedophilic. So other artists are also weird for drawing thir ship as adult and child even if the scenarios are wholesome like this????

    tongtong May 9, 2024 1:25 pm
    The art itself doesn't have any sex depicted, sure. But the implication is still there. If I was drawn as a child next to my adult husband and nothing would be going on in the drawing it would still be iffy. If... Melantha

    and to the soud of freedom yes it would absolutely weird even if the children are fully clothed because THE FUCKING INTENTIONS ARE WIERD AND CRIMINAL IN THE FIRST PLACE. here jjk won't fucking traffic these kids omggg

    Tinyrum May 9, 2024 1:26 pm

    You’re the weirdo for commenting this bs

    tongtong May 9, 2024 1:27 pm
    The art itself doesn't have any sex depicted, sure. But the implication is still there. If I was drawn as a child next to my adult husband and nothing would be going on in the drawing it would still be iffy. If... Melantha

    Anyways i don't want to argue with you anymore lmao if you think this is weird then so be it but please be careful of throwing the word pedophilia whene there's literally nothing pedophilic here, you guys are just making that word lost its meaning

    Melantha May 9, 2024 1:39 pm
    Anyways i don't want to argue with you anymore lmao if you think this is weird then so be it but please be careful of throwing the word pedophilia whene there's literally nothing pedophilic here, you guys are j... tongtong

    I will agree with you on that one, and will concede that I've overreacted because at the end of the day my concerns are mine only. I too don't like it when people use the words that have strong evil connotations lightly. But I can't help but feel eeew everytime authors turn their characters into children. I didn't like it in TGCF, didn't like in Dawn of the dragon, don't like it in the art with Jae-Shin and Nok, I don't like it here.

    tongtong May 9, 2024 1:49 pm
    I will agree with you on that one, and will concede that I've overreacted because at the end of the day my concerns are mine only. I too don't like it when people use the words that have strong evil connotatio... Melantha

    Okay, I understand your feeling and trying to think why ppl feel that way (if I think about it there are surely a lot of reasons) idk if I sounded like invalidating (that's not my intention) it is just quite shocking to see ppl think of this as pedophilic weird shit. My intention here is to Iexplain on my perspective why it is not weird and pedophilic and just an innocent art, hopefully I don't sound like i am fighting ppl, English is not my main language so idk if I'm using right words, intonation, or punctuations lol

    Melantha May 9, 2024 1:56 pm
    Okay, I understand your feeling and trying to think why ppl feel that way (if I think about it there are surely a lot of reasons) idk if I sounded like invalidating (that's not my intention) it is just quite sh... tongtong

    It's all good

    Safety Advocate May 9, 2024 4:01 pm

    Personally that works out for me. I hoped to see Dan as a baby. New material for my nightly endeavors.

    I love Morning Diamonds aka me May 9, 2024 4:06 pm

    The
    Safety Advocate May 9, 2024 4:01 pm
    Is a cyberstalker impersonating the real Safety. They claim they are trolling and we are hypersensitive troll victims but they are not. Ignore them as they will gaslight you and use rage bait for you to hate the real users. 99.9 % is all a lie. It is part of their “troll” aka harassment on a few people.

    I love Morning Diamonds aka me May 9, 2024 4:07 pm

    There are two accounts that look like Safety. There are 4 accounts that looks like this account. I am not the real morning diamonds I am defending him from the two cyberstalking him.